Entry tags:
One Sentence a Day
So,
amieroserotruck passed on some excellent advice the other day: no matter what, write one sentence a day. She apparently picked this up from Stephen King, but I'm still crediting her brilliance in keeping up with it and passing it along. Because of this new rule, I'm happy to say that I have *actually started* that elusive YA novel that I've been talking about for months and months. Hurrah!
In the mean time, I still have other projects that I'm working on--which is a good thing, because I just realized that I only have three outstanding invoices. While John Scalzi* says not to count your chickens before they're hatched (or to count your invoices before the checks get there), I do my darndest now to only work for companies (or other freelancers) that will, reliably, fulfill my invoices. Having only three outstanding means, well, that I'd better get back to work!
*If you are a writer who makes a living via writing--or are a writer who would like to--this essay is really excellent. My only quibble is that there's a difference to me between making a living writing and making a living writing what I want to write. I picked up Well Fed Writer: Financial Self-Sufficiency as a Freelance Writer in Six Months or Less from the library when it was recommended to me and discovered something about myself: I would rather make a living doing something *not* writing--like working at the library (which I enjoy) or going back into bookselling--than making a living writing memos and promotional materials for companies. I don't think that people who do are sell outs or anything like that--but like some of my freelance-artists friends can't imagine going back to a 9 to 5 job, I've found that I'd much rather have that steady job if it means I get to write what I want to write. I'm in a balanced place right now: writing half time, working a reliable job half time, and it seems to be working out okay for me (though I'm not making nearly the figures of Mr. Scalzi). I suspect work environment is all a matter of preference. And now I've completely blathered on when I meant to stop a whole paragraph ago--I've got work to churn out so I can submit invoices! :)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
In the mean time, I still have other projects that I'm working on--which is a good thing, because I just realized that I only have three outstanding invoices. While John Scalzi* says not to count your chickens before they're hatched (or to count your invoices before the checks get there), I do my darndest now to only work for companies (or other freelancers) that will, reliably, fulfill my invoices. Having only three outstanding means, well, that I'd better get back to work!
*If you are a writer who makes a living via writing--or are a writer who would like to--this essay is really excellent. My only quibble is that there's a difference to me between making a living writing and making a living writing what I want to write. I picked up Well Fed Writer: Financial Self-Sufficiency as a Freelance Writer in Six Months or Less from the library when it was recommended to me and discovered something about myself: I would rather make a living doing something *not* writing--like working at the library (which I enjoy) or going back into bookselling--than making a living writing memos and promotional materials for companies. I don't think that people who do are sell outs or anything like that--but like some of my freelance-artists friends can't imagine going back to a 9 to 5 job, I've found that I'd much rather have that steady job if it means I get to write what I want to write. I'm in a balanced place right now: writing half time, working a reliable job half time, and it seems to be working out okay for me (though I'm not making nearly the figures of Mr. Scalzi). I suspect work environment is all a matter of preference. And now I've completely blathered on when I meant to stop a whole paragraph ago--I've got work to churn out so I can submit invoices! :)
no subject
no subject
In the 2.5 years I was in the program, one of my instructors had his book chosen as an Oprah Book Club selection. Obviously at that point he didn't need to teach anymore. He stopped teaching for a while, but then he actually went back to teaching because he loved it. Another instructor's book become a worldwide bestseller, and after taking time off from teaching, she finally went back to it. I imagine it was for the same reason--a love of teaching.
Even the instructors I knew who didn't teach (outside of the Vermont MFA program) and who considered themselves fiction writers first and foremost earned at least part of their living doing other things: writing reviews, public speaking, etc.
I could go on for a long time on this subject, but I would end up boring even myself!
no subject
Back in the midlate 70s and early 80s I was doing pretty well in SF, selling material regularly (if not for a lot of money) and even getting a little critical mention, plus a double Hugo nomination in 1981. I was workshopping with the Chicago powers (Gene Wolfe, A. J. Budrys, George R. R. Martin, among others) and later learning at the knee of Nancy Kress in Rochester NY. In 1983 I started selling computer-related articles to various tech magazines, and at the end of 1984 I took a job with Ziff-Davis Publishing as tech editor of one of their lead magazines, a job that involved a lot of "developmental editing" (translation: heavy rewrites of illiterate material from tech people who could not write worth a dime) and regular contributions of my own original articles. I soon had a monthly column. I loved the work, and tore into it with a fury.
And by the time I got home, the well was dry. I didn't write any more SF until I became unemployed for 18 months in 1988, and didn't write much fiction at all until my publishing company grew to the point where I was "kicked upstairs" and did more managing and planning than writing and editing. At that point the floodgates opened again, and I did a 145,000 word novel in 18 months while still working full-time as #2 man at Arizona's largest book publisher.
Some people have a near-infinite supply of words in them. Most do not. I certainly didn't, even as a relatively young man. It isn't how hard you work. It's what you do.
Most of my computer tech writing is long obsolete and largely forgotten, and while I did well financially and was reasonably well-known back in the day, in my darker moments I find myself admitting that tech writing ate my SF career before it ever quite got off the ground.
I heard this at Clarion: "If you want to write SF, don't be a writer in your day job." I think it was Damon Knight's advice. It's true. My only defense is that it paid well; nay, very well. I think I made the right decision, which doesn't mean I don't regret it now and then.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I do a lot of non-fiction writing and reviews, but it tends to be work that's interesting--not creative, per say, but analysis and synthesis. Writing obituaries has been fascinating for me, and I think it actually puts a lot of fodder in there for the fiction later. But I'll have to look at those days and see if I feel like writing fiction when I've been working on those assignments.
no subject
So I guess I did live in Vermont for about 4 weeks a year for a couple of years. :-) In Montpelier.
no subject
Then the problem becomes spending the time and money to get the PhD (if you want the full time job) and then getting the job with the 200 other applicants. If you get an MFA, you have to deal with the people who say it isn't a real terminal degree (insert joke about it almost killing me), or those who expect extensive publication along with an MFA to get a tenure-track position. To which I always joke, "If I had the kind of publication credentials you are looking for, I wouldn't be applying for this job." Of course, not many college writing teachers find that amusing. ;-)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject