Date: 2009-06-19 06:13 pm (UTC)
You should go back in my guest blog tag and check out Mark Vecchio's definitions, which he kindly allowed me to post. Mark talks about Arthurian "myth" as being in the "legends" category, rather than mythology. I think it comes down to where your definitions break up: I tend to build an order of degradation (if you will):

Religion -> Mythology -> Folk-tales/Fairy-tales

Most folk stories start off in mythology, and one could argue that mythology comes out of an old religion. (Although you could also argue that religion, with all its formal rules, comes out of mythology -- the reason I put it between religion and fairy-tales is based on where I see it falling in the academic spectrum: religion is a field of study, mythology (as in classics) is respectable, and fairy-tales are for lit departments.) Legends seem to be primarily concerned with the realm/domain of men, so Arthur would be legendary, and Odysseus might even fit better in legends than in myths. But they're all so interrelated, it's hard to tell.

I haven't yet read all of the Maginogian, so I can't speak to that, but I think the last of the three Irish Myth cycles is firmly fairy-tale territory. (I think this ought to elevate fairy-tales, rather than degrade the cycle, but I suspect that wouldn't hold up in an academic paper. *g*)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

alanajoli: (Default)
Alana Joli Abbott

November 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213141516 1718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 10:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios