Golden Compass and Christian Romances

I took the test to find out what my Daemon is (because amieroserotruck and did theirs), despite my reservations about the "His Dark Materials" trilogy (which is unarguably beautifully written--my reservations are for different reasons). It's behind the cut, if you'd like to influence what my daemon looks like.

( Read more... )

I find it delightful that he started out as one of Morrigan's children--or as a Trickster, depending on whether you prefer Celtic imagery or American Indian. I'm not as fond of Norse, so Odin didn't come to mind until just now.

--

I've said here on this journal that I have issues with fiction particularly marketed to a subculture. I realize in some ways this isn't fair: any genre writing could, arguably, be marketed to a subculture, so by virtue of my being a genre writer, making statements like that is hypocritical. So I'll try to explain a little better why it bothers me. It's particularly Christian fiction that sets itself aside from mainstream fiction that gets on my nerves, in part because it's declaring itself to have a very limited audience (we don't want any atheist, Jewish, or Hindu readers, for example), but also because I've met people who then *only* read Christian fiction, because it's acceptable fiction. (I've met Christians who refuse to read fiction at all, because it's all lies.) The imposition of those limits grates on my nerves a bit.

Which is why I am thrilled to talk about Bethany House. I saw a book at the library the other day with an enchanting cover--a novel of Regency England with aspects of the typical Regency romance novel, but much more about the self-discovery that the heroine goes through over the course of the novel. From the outside of the novel--cover to blurbs on the back--it gives every appearance of being either straight-fiction, or fiction that would appeal to romance readers. The only reason I was aware of it as a Christian novel is because I know that Bethany House is a Christian publisher. I think all of their novels are shelved under religious fiction at Barnes and Noble, but at my local library, they're considered regular fiction, where they can find a wider audience.

If my whole thought process still sounds hypocritical, since I have no trouble with science-fiction and fantasy being shelved separately from regular fiction (and, in fact, was upset when Susanna Clarke's wonderful Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell was shelved in the fiction section instead of SFF), I'd like to know! I'd hate to be a hypocrite just because I don't care for how something is marketed.

Technopeasant Wretches?

I'd been seeing a lot of people posting work online as part of the Pixel-Stained Technopeasant Wretch movement, and had no idea what spurred this on. (If I had something I wasn't still planning to submit laying about, I would have posted it as well--though I don't currently have a website to call my own where it would be convenient to post it. Also, the vast majority of my short stories hover around the 7500 word mark, making them, in my mind, too long to read in one computer sitting. Of course, I've been dedicating spare moments online to reading the novel or novella Sherwood Smith [sartorias] posted, so I suppose if people love your work enough they'll sit for the duration.)

At any rate, thanks to Brandon Sanderson (mistborn), I now know where the term originated! Apparently the current/soon-to-be-former VP of the SFWA Howard V. Hendrix called authors who post their work for free online "webscabs" and coined the phrase Pixel-stained Technopeasant Wretch. The large number of free fiction postings was in response to this. Here's the original SFWA post, if you're further interested.