Writing for Hire
Dec. 10th, 2007 10:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
John Scalzi recently posted something I read with great sadness: Dragon magazine is unfortunately buying all rights for fiction, rather than paying 3-6 cents per word and first rights (or similar). That effectively makes it work-for-hire. I don't have any problems with work-for-hire, as a rule, but I'll only do work-for-hire fiction if I'm working in someone else's world. If I'm already using their IP, then it makes some degree of sense to me that they retain the rights.
I have discovered, however, that this is not always in the writer's best interest. I don't suspect Dragon (the new digital WotC published version, not the Paizo print version, which ended) will change their minds about this, which is a shame as I'd love to be published there. And knowing that there are others out there with similar magazine tastes, I figured I'd spread the heads up. The conversation on Scalzi's blog is really interesting as well.
I have discovered, however, that this is not always in the writer's best interest. I don't suspect Dragon (the new digital WotC published version, not the Paizo print version, which ended) will change their minds about this, which is a shame as I'd love to be published there. And knowing that there are others out there with similar magazine tastes, I figured I'd spread the heads up. The conversation on Scalzi's blog is really interesting as well.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 03:17 am (UTC)In my opinion, John Scalzi doesn't seem to understand 1) the game market or 2) that this not a print magazine anymore and 3) is a ezine targeted at a specific group within the gamer audience.
It sounds as though those guidelines have been removed as of yesterday however, so it may be a moot point. Rumor has it that there will be no more fiction in the Dragon ezine. A small, but vocal group of D&D gamers complained very loudly about fiction polluting their game content.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:11 am (UTC)I also find it irritating that the small but vocal people irritated with fiction could get it removed. With an online magazine, it's not like you have to click the fiction links if you don't want to.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:14 am (UTC)I don't think Scalzi ever considered that. But it seems to be a moot point now.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-12 02:12 am (UTC)And everyone seems to be focusing on his comments on pay, but the only thing people should worry about are rights. Unless I'm writing in Greyhawk, Faerun, or Eberron, they can't have my rights. Period.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-12 03:27 am (UTC)But if they're not going to publish fiction anyway, it's a rather moot point! We'll just have to wait and see. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 07:59 pm (UTC)But, it could also be a focus, kind of a "oh yeah, what about fiction? we used to have that, right?" kind of response that the online stuff has.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 05:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 10:27 pm (UTC)At this point, unless I'm contracted directly to work in someone else's IP, I won't give up rights. I honestly feel I should have taken a little better care of my IP rights in some of the work I've already done. If it's a completely original piece of work, I won't submit it to a place where I can't retain the rights after a certain period of time.
But then, I don't pay to submit work to contests either (unless my entry fee covers, say, a year's subscription to the magazine to which I'm submitting). So everyone's line about what they will and won't submit to is a little different.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 10:47 pm (UTC)It's frustrating to have to deal with these kinds of issues, isn't it? "This market is less ethical than this market, because the writers will submit to worse treatment so it just makes good business sense ..." I often feel that capitalism and art just don't mix.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-12 03:28 am (UTC)