Hello, Randy! Thanks for stopping by. I don't suppose you have an lj feed for your personal blog, do you? I'm awful with rss feeds beyond lj.
While this may be in line with Carr's point--if he'd made it meatier, would the audience for which he was writing have read it? (It sounds like you and Jeff would have--I read the article while at the reference desk at the library, distracted by patrons rather than internet opportunities, but still multitasking. Something more clinical or technical, I don't think I could have managed!)
But yes, I'd certainly like to see some more research on what he's discussing. It's interesting enough to merit further lay-reading, since neuroscience really isn't my specialty!
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2008-08-23 03:59 am (UTC)While this may be in line with Carr's point--if he'd made it meatier, would the audience for which he was writing have read it? (It sounds like you and Jeff would have--I read the article while at the reference desk at the library, distracted by patrons rather than internet opportunities, but still multitasking. Something more clinical or technical, I don't think I could have managed!)
But yes, I'd certainly like to see some more research on what he's discussing. It's interesting enough to merit further lay-reading, since neuroscience really isn't my specialty!