alanajoli: (Default)
As I mentioned earlier, the lovely Maggie Stiefvater ([livejournal.com profile] m_steifvater) will be joining the blog on Friday as part of her tour promoting Shiver, which comes out September 1st. To prep me for her guest blog, Maggie very, very kindly had her publicist send me an advance copy of Shiver, which I devoured today. I started it this afternoon, taking a break from some copyediting work, and the book did not want to be put down. So, this is my very brief, non-spoilery review of Shiver to prep y'all for Maggie's visit on Friday.

Grace was attacked by werewolves as a child, and was saved by Sam, a young wolf destined to one day become the pack leader. Over the years, they watch each other, girl and wolf, with Sam never revealing his identity. (This is in the first ten pages, so I promise, not spoilery.) When events bring them together, finally, their romance takes on the star-crossed lover archetype to the nth degree. This is a Romeo and Juliet where Romeo isn't a fickle teen, devoted to one girl at the beginning of the play but willing to kill himself for another by the end; where Juliet isn't a teen in the throes of her first love with no sense of practicality and meaning. Sam and Grace are real people in an extraordinary situation, given a limited shot at true love.

I don't normally recommend books on the basis that they make me cry (I cry at a lot of books, and don't usually pick up books based on the "made me cry" recommendation from others), but Shiver is heartwrenching and beautiful and worthy of all the tears I spent on it. Not only is the relationship between Grace and Sam potent, but the relationships of each of them to their friends and family/pack are so amazingly well drawn that many of the touching moments came out of those, rather than the romance.

I'm having trouble finishing the review without just devolving into gushing, so I think I'll leave it here, with the highest recommendation. Don't forget to come back and hear about the novel in Maggie's own words on Friday!
alanajoli: (lol deadlines)
...and here I am blogging. Figures, no?

The count so far is four obituaries left and three short essays, but at this point I've gone through all the research and made notes. In theory, this should make the work go faster. In practice, well, I'm blogging. Which is not getting work done.

I did get a good bit of reading done yesterday, getting me closer to finishing at least one of the three reviews left.

The scanning project... well, I may decide to bring it with me. There are quiet evenings on the trip. Last year, I edited the first quarter of Regaining Home on a computer that has since died--so all of my edits have vanished, though I still have the original work from Shawn. Now, a year later, I suspect I'll make different changes anyway.

My edits on "Don't Let Go" are about half-complete as well. Dylan ([livejournal.com profile] eyezofwolf) was great at getting the edits back to me nearly immediately. His changes will make the story better, which is the thing I love most about the editing process. It's like putting rocks through a tumbler--they're prettier when they come out. (There are a few rare exceptions, and I suppose that might be true of the editorial process as well.)

Despite all that stuff still on my to-do list, it was great going back to campus yesterday and seeing people I've traveled with or shared meals with (and one classmate of mine who is finally a graduate) receive their degrees. It was an absolutely beautiful day for it (unlike my own graduation, which was rainy and cold), and I actually got sunburn on my face from being out in the sun for several hours. (The sunburn isn't fun, of course, but spending that much time in sunshine is certainly lifting to the spirits!) Which reminds me that I still need to pack the sunscreen for my trip.
alanajoli: (daiyu)
The extremely awesome [livejournal.com profile] stargatedragon recently published the Chinese Zodiac info I was looking for--only with more story! (The personality types start at the end of page two, but the myth of the zodiac itself is well worth the read.)

In other news, I am making progress on my work. I turned in a review to SLJ today, have written several of the obituaries, and wrote a blurb on a forthcoming book (which was incredibly exciting for me, as the blurb was for an author whose work I very much admire). More work will be accomplished tomorrow.

And now, just for grins and giggles: Who comments the most on this journal? )
alanajoli: (orb)
My main character is now twelfth level. Huzzah! We had a great fun weekend, with an official RPGA mod, a tailor-made DM's Mark, and outdoor cooking on the grill. We even started one of our games out in the back yard. How can that not be fun? (We didn't even lose any dice outside, which is the real challenge to backyard D&D.)

In other news, I got the trip itinerary for Greece and Turkey today, so the countdown can officially start. Here's what I have outstanding before I leave:

1) I have the rough of "Don't Let Go" out with Dylan ([livejournal.com profile] eyezofwolf). I don't know if edits will actually happen on that before I go or not.
2) I have an edited version of "The Best Things Get Better with Age," my contribution to Serenity Adventures, out with Jamie Chambers. I don't know if I'll be getting any more edits back on *that* or not, either.
3) I have three essays and eight obituaries to write.
4) I have a scanning project that I had fully intended to get done before I left.
5) I was hoping to actually do some comic writing before I left, in case C&AII possibly comes off hiatus while I'm gone.
6) I've been asked to finish two more reviews for [livejournal.com profile] flamesrising and two for School Library Journal.

There are some other incidentals (like following up on contracts, etc.). But really? That's a lot to get done by the 20th. Along with plans to get together with friends (including lunch/coffee with [livejournal.com profile] jenlyn_b and [livejournal.com profile] amanda_marrone tomorrow--so excited!) and attending graduation at Simon's Rock on Saturday to see some friends get their shiny new pieces of paper that kick them out of being undergrads, I'll be cutting it close. Eight days left. Wish me luck!
alanajoli: (Kennerly)
So for the last two days I've been watching the community [livejournal.com profile] told_tales, a list about fairy tales. It looks like a great community that just posts way too often for me to keep up with. I may pop back by from time to time, but I have enough trouble keeping up with all the author blogs I read! I've already added the wonderful Mythopoeic Society mailing list to my daily reading, and I think I may be at a reading limit for a bit.

*

For folks who have been talking about 4e, Keith Baker wrote in an excellent recent blog post "Is there any compelling reason to rush to switch your game to 4E... or to ever run a 4E Eberron campaign? Your mileage may vary. I'm not going to say 4E is going to be all games to all people. But the fact of the matter is that I not only prefer it as a system, I feel that it's a BETTER system for the Eberron setting than 3E - that in plays to things that I consider fundamental themes of the Eberron Campaign Setting."

As far as I'm aware, Keith hasn't been involved in the development of 4e directly (though of course he's involved in converting Eberron), so I think it's a nice vote of confidence to see this coming from him. I also like that he acknowledges 4e may not be the be all, end all--which leaves some great room for individual taste (as, I believe, all games should).

*

Matt from [livejournal.com profile] flamesrising just posted my recent review of Happy Hour of the Damned by Mark Henry [livejournal.com profile] mdhenry. Now that the new [livejournal.com profile] flamesrising site is up, Matt has been posting several of the reviews I wrote this winter, and it's nice to see them up there. He's overwhelmingly sent me books that I liked, and I'm grateful for that. :)
alanajoli: (Default)
We had a lovely Christmas and New Year's off in the arctic lands of Michigan, staying with my family. While delightful, this led to a very long cold that persists in hanging on, so I've been a little slow getting back into the swing of things! I'm looking over some guest blogs that have come in and getting ready to figure out a posting schedule (as well as deciding my best course of action for pestering the folks who were excited about writing guest entries but haven't yet). I've been reading some books for review for FlamesRising (Happy Hour of the Damned by [livejournal.com profile] mdhenry, which is going to get a very good review), some books for School Library Journal (the best series of mythology books for kids that they've yet sent me!), and some books just for fun (Skullduggery Pleasant, which is a delightful Irish YA fantasy novel with some of the best banter since Firefly was on the air).

In the news this week, the United States has decided to follow the example of the U.K. and has formed a "national ambassador for children's books" position much like the Children's Laureate in Britain. It is a two year appointment, supported by the Library of Congress and the Children's Book Council. Their selection for the first author to fill this position? None other than "Guys Read" founder and proponent of helping more young people become readers-for-life, Jon Scieszka. Long a favorite of mine (since the days of The True Story of the 3 Little Pigs and the beginning of his "Time Warp Trio" series, which I was theoretically too old for when they came out, but I don't quibble over the details), Scieszka is amazingly enthusiastic at doing outreach for reluctant readers. I was lucky to write the update essay on his work in 2005 for the Something about the Author series, and reading about what he's been working toward—not just with his own work, but with trying to bring in other writers to encourage reluctant readers, especially boys, to get hooked on reading—really impressed me. If anyone will do a great job as the first person in this position, he's at the top of the list. (Right up there next to him is Rick Riordan.) So congrats, Mr. Scieszka!
alanajoli: (Default)
I got this over at [livejournal.com profile] tltrent's and realized she probably didn't want it completed in her comments section.

1. Unpublished completed works:
Novels:
Safari Scarab - This is the first novel I ever wrote (finished in high school), and I think I'd like to do a full rewrite, giving it an entirely different setting, but leaving the plot and character motivations largely the same.

Short Stories:
I've given up counting the number of times my short stories have been rejected. Note: I've submitted them all to Glimmer Train, but none have been accepted there. The ones currently making the rounds are:
"Autumn Leaves" -- a story about identity, family, and the power of myth, sort of
"Moving Back to Europe" -- a story about conflict avoidance and learning how to actually face problems instead of turning away
"Rocks" -- a true fable about a boy, a rock, a shaman, and a journey
"Nomi's Wish" -- my very favorite of my pieces, about two sisters traveling on the Isle of Man, trying to get close to the storyteller they both loved as children
"The Valley" -- a near-horror story, out with [livejournal.com profile] t_e_o_p right now, so I can hope it'll change categories soon!
"Leaving Moscow" -- I need to scan this in, since the electronic copy is gone; it's based on a Chekov play, The Three Sisters, which may be such an obscure reference that it never really comes through

2. Unpublished Incomplete Works
Novel: Children of Gods - Tentative title, as it's not done, and I don't actually want to *write* the synopsis, though apparently I can tell the whole story in person, which I did this weekend. I'm not sure if this is a good sign or a bad sign.

3. Solicited Unfinished Works
Nonfiction-
A solicited but not yet begun interview with a local environmentalist for CTGreenScene, where I hope to become a regular contributor; reviews of Ilona Andrew's Magic Bites, Patricia McKillip's Solstice Wood, Melissa Marr's Wicked Lovely, and assorted books on mythology for School Library Journal.

4. Published Works:
Novels: Into the Reach and Departure for White Silver. Regaining Home is somewhere in the ether between unpublished and published.
Comics: Cowboys and Aliens 2 for Platinum. Worlds at War, which is now its own seperate comic, is on its way. Maybe December or January.
RPG stuff: Gallia, Steampunk Musha RPG, and various contributions to other books

So, I changed the meme around a bit to sort of encompass what it is I'm actually working on. But the easiest thing to notice here is that while I've been published through solicitation, the stuff I've actually had to shop around has been hard to place with the right home. Which should be encouraging to folks who are shopping stuff around--I think that's really the hardest part of the whole process.
alanajoli: (lady scribbler)
Exciting book find of the day: Don't Know Much about Mythology: Everything You Need to Know About the Greatest Stories in Human History but Never Learned. I assume this is from the same folks who put out Don't Know Much about History a number of years ago, which had a reputation for being both entertaining and informative. More news as I actually read the book. ;)

--

I got a package in the mail today from [livejournal.com profile] flamesrising (Thanks Matt!) with books and a CD for reviewing. Much to my delight, one of the books was Ilona Andrews's Magic Bites, which I'd already started reading. Now I have a copy of my very own!

(Ilona has a livejournal, but I can't put my finger on her username at the moment. I may update later.)

Edit: It's [livejournal.com profile] ilona_andrews, obviously. *facepalm*

--

Over at Cowboys and Aliens, we've announced a contest to have your likeness become a character in chapter two of our story. Go visit and enter!

--

And last, but not least, SpaceWesterns.com is having a limerick contest, to be judged by Jane Espenson and Keith R. A. DeCandido. The results should be amusing! I'm getting my five line rhythm going to prepare my entry.
alanajoli: (Default)
This is outside the usual genre I discuss, so if you're not into contemporary YA fiction too much, it might not be for you. (Then again, Neil Gaiman loved it, so it might.) Sherman Alexie's new YA novel, The Absolutely True Diary of a Part Time Indian, is amazing. I started it last night, finished it this afternoon, and think I have never both laughed and cried so much in one book. It's both extremely grounded and wonderfully full of hope, and it blew me away. It is definitely well worth reading.

And I'm actually not going to give away any more than that (except to say that Neil Gaiman figures it'll be one of the most banned books put out this year--so it may have some controversial content for conservative readers, who are totally missing out).
alanajoli: (Default)
On my desk is The Greek Myths: Complete Edition by Robert Graves. On its way here from the library is The Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph Campbell (as I, alas, don't have a copy of my own). In my purse are articles about heroes and modernity (or the heroic in modernity, as one of the authors believes that democracy cancels out the need for actual heroes and instead praises the heroic in ordinary people).

And away in my e-mail went my abstract to Dr. Jes Battis as an application for inclusion in A Dragon Wrecked My Prom. Wish me luck! (If I had anything to give away right now, I'd offer a prize for anyone who figured out what teen hero I've chosen for my essay given the resources mentioned above.)

--

Complete tangent: I love the people at School Library Journal. They send me such awesome books. Granted, some are less awesome after reading than others, but all of them are awesome in concept. I get books about mythology, martial arts, comics, and teen fantasy. Being a reviewer rocks! I love that the editors are totally in tune with the types of books I'd be likely to pick up for myself--it seems like such a good plan to send books to people who are actually likely to appreciate them, rather than sending them out to an already reluctant audience.

LJ Review

Sep. 28th, 2007 10:05 pm
alanajoli: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] dmoonfire was kind enough to post his review of Into the Reach on his livejournal. He's got a good eye for some of what I was really trying to do right (yay!) and some of what didn't work so well, but I tried to improve upon in books two and three. It's potentially spoilery (vague enough that most probably won't mind), so if you haven't read Into the Reach, consider yourself warned.
alanajoli: (Default)
For those of you interested in reading the reviews of my novels, Matt at Flames Rising just posted a great review of Departure. Thanks Matt! I feel like Matt really got what I was trying to do with the novel, and that's thrilling. ;)

Oh, for those who have read Departure and are as frustrated as Matt with the cliff-hanger, I promise I didn't know Regaining Home was going to be delayed! I had no intention of being quite this mean! As soon as I hear word on when Regaining Home will be back on the schedule, I'll let you all know.
alanajoli: (Default)
I've discovered two novels about superheroes since my post on June 30 about how there weren't any. They've actually both been released since my complaint, however, so I am just ahead of the curve. Not enough so to have written my own before the trend hit, but enough to have anticipated the superhero novel in major bookstores.

The first, which I have on hold and will get from my library shortly, is Soon I Will Be Invincible, which was recommended to me highly by a friend. The second is Karma Girl (which, on Amazon, came up on the same search page with [livejournal.com profile] shanna_s's most recent novel, Damsel under Stress).

I'll let you know what I think of them. I'm still formulating reviews of the last two books I read (Bound by Iron and Territory--two completely different, genre mixing books), but should have some thoughts to keyboard this week. Otherwise I'll forget all the clever and insightful things I intend to say.
alanajoli: (Default)
(Not that the Rupert Grint quote isn't cute. It's pretty much made me smile since I found it yesterday. But that's not what I meant to write about.)

I just got the second volume of Sorcerers and Secretaries by Amy Kim Ganter in the mail yesterday. The manga is a two-volume set, so the whole story is told in two books, and it's adorable! The plot isn't hugely complex: it's a story of romantic tension between a directionless bookseller who finds direction by helping a writer follow her true path. Along with being a great story about budding friendship/trust/romance (following some of the basic romantic comedy movie plot tropes), it's also a story about how fiction can bridge the gap between two people to reconcile their differences. The resolution may be a bit too easy, but it's a sweet story that, if you read manga, I highly recommend.
alanajoli: (Default)
I think I've stated before that I loved the first Pirates of the Caribbean movie. The second was funny, if not as overall good a movie as the first, and had the kind of ending that required a third movie to decide whether or not the second was actually any good. Pirates of the Caribbean: At Worlds End didn't quite make it.

Spoilers behind the cut )

At any rate, given an extra five to eight minutes (which they could have taken out of Jack's crazy time), something like that would have provided a bit more conclusion to the loose ends. (Not that I've done well capturing the voices of the characters, but I'm sure you get the idea.)

In my mind, that's what *really* happened. ;)
alanajoli: (Default)
On the trip home, I finally finished Depths of Madness by Erik Scott de Bie ([livejournal.com profile] eriksdb). This novel was far less linear than his previous book, Ghostwalker, and had a lot more character development--in sort of an odd way. Only one of the main characters who shares the story from his/her POV continues to be a main character right through the very end. The whole story, being about madness, keeps reality spinning from the very beginning. Is any of it really happening? If it is, who's the spy among the group? Even as the story ended, I wasn't sure if the villain would twist into a different identity, leaving one of our heroes innocent after all. The novel is extremely creepy, darker than a lot of the sword and sorcery novels in the Forgotten Realms line, and sets up the potential for more stories with the main character--an incredibly bitchy, independent anti-hero who is utterly likable despite her flaws (perhaps because of them).

I've mentioned here a couple of times that I've been reading this novel, and to tell the truth, it took me awhile to get into the story--not due to any real fault of de Bie's, but because there were so many references to Forgotten Realms gods, places, and words that I had no connection to (I'm not a big Realms reader, as I decided ages ago that there was no hope of my ever catching up; I've enjoyed Douglas Niles, a chunk of R. A. Salvatore, and a little Ed Greenwood, but they're the only ones besides de Bie that I read). Realms fans will have no trouble keeping up, but I struggled with figuring out why some things that were said were cause for contention inside the group.

Overall, if you enjoy fantasy with a healthy does of creepy, a non-linear plot, mixed with a little bit of mystery as you second guess what's going along right along with the characters, definitely pick up Depths of Madness. Particularly if you're already a Forgotten Realms reader.

--

Upon arriving home, I finished Senrid, which I started before I left but didn't pack, as I didn't have room for another hard cover. When I started the novel, I was worried that I wasn't going to like it--an emotion I hated because I've always enjoyed Sherwood Smith's ([livejournal.com profile] sartorias) writing so much! As stated on the back of the novel, Senrid was written when Smith was only fifteen, so it lacks the polish of her later works (despite its being published more recently). Unlike Crown Duel and Inda (and even in her online novel Shevraeth at Marloven Hess), magic is far more powerful and accessible in Senrid. Several of the main characters come from other worlds--a detail that no one seems to think is unusual. Of the other worldly characters, several are actually from Earth, instantly putting the novel in the category of "earth kids have adventures in fantasy worlds," something I hadn't been prepared for when I picked up the book. But as my brain adjusted to the ideas, the way the world worked during this time, and the idea that this story in fact happened in the middle of several other tales, I was able to suspend my disbelief in a way that hadn't been required of me by Smith's other books.

After I left, having read half of the book, I kept thinking about it. What was Senrid doing while I was away? Would we meet Sartora in this book? Was Kitty the simpering little girl she seemed to be, or would she actually develop a spine? The more I returned to the story in my head, the more I was desperate to read the novel when I got home. When I arrived home, I eagerly snatched it up and read the rest of the story, watching Senrid's conversion from outright villain to anti-hero to something approaching an actual, kingly hero.

The quote on the back of the book, explaining that Senrid is a peek into Smith's imagination as a teen, is spot on. Taking it in that frame of mind and accepting that yes, there are Earth teens involved, the novel is absolutely wonderful. I would recommend it to the "Redwall" crowd, anyone who enjoyed Smith's "Wren" books, and readers who have grown out of the Narnia books but don't yet read more sophisticated books like Smith's Crown Duel or any of Tamora Pierce's series. I'd also recommend it to anyone who has read the other works set in the world, with the warning that despite its label as YA, it's more of a novel for children than young adults. Had I known all of that, I would never have had to worry about not liking it--I'd have loved it from the first page.

Now, of course, I'm desperate for more. When was Senrid a captive of the Norsundarians? When did he meet Sartora? There are gaps in my understanding of the world, so I hope that Senrid does well enough that we'll see the other texts from Smith's teen writing years to fill out the holes.

--

I watched two movies on the flight home: Eragon, which I'd missed in theaters, and Music and Lyrics, which I don't really have anyone to watch with me, as my chick-flick buddies live in California and Boston. There's really only one way for me to describe Eragon: OAV. As explained to me, and OAV is an anime that is designed just so that fans of a manga can see their favorite characters animated. It's fine to leave huge gaps in the plot, because everyone already knows what's going to happen, and it's just the novelty of their favorite characters moving that keeps people watching.

Eragon the movie stripped the Eragon story of everything that made it interesting to me as a reader. This is not in any way the fault of the actors, who I thought were quite good. Jeremy Irons was great, and the new actor playing Eragon did a nice job with the script he was handed. The script, however--ugh. Part of what makes Eragon (the book) interesting is that Paolini plays with the idea of consciousness and makes Saphira, the dragon, feel qualitatively different than her human companions, just by the way she thinks and talks. The other part that I remember being extremely appealing to me is that Eragon questions whether he's doing the right thing by going to the Varden. Only a very little bit of that moral quandary comes across--it's mostly swept by in the effort to show more special effects. Angela, one of the most intriguing characters in the novel, is completely ruined.

General assessment? If you can see it for free and have three hours of your life that you don't have to spend on anything else, sure, go ahead and watch it. It worked for me, and it was at least diverting if not enjoyable.

Lyrics and Music, on the other hand, had me in stitches. I think it's one of the best romantic comedies I've ever seen. Drew Barrymore, who I usually don't much care for, is stellar in her performance of a completely nutty writer. The commentary on the music industry (both in the eighties and now) is hysterical, as is the use of things like VH1's Pop up Video. It's a movie I think Shanna Swendson ([livejournal.com profile] shanna_s) would approve of, and as she's had some rather harsh criticism of the romantic comedy industry as of late, I think that's probably a good sign.
alanajoli: (Default)
This is a follow up to yesterday, as it's been stewing a little more in my head. In the NYTBR article, if I recall correctly, one of the quotes mentioned that if there aren't reviews in newspapers, then people aren't going to know about books. My gut reaction was, "Actually, newspaper readers aren't going to know about books." I find the notion that all people have access to newspapers--or choose to read them--as suspect as the notion that all people have access to the internet--and choose to use it.

So here's my question of the day: of the newspaper reading demographic, what portion of them are book buyers? Of the book buying demographic, how many of them read newspapers? Knowing how those two markets intersect would be a really interesting twist on this conversation, and might show a more solid argument in favor of why keeping book reviews in newspapers is important to the publishing industry.

As a sub-thought: I do understand why some people feel more comfortable with book reviews that are actually chosen and viewed by an editor before they're published, rather than simply trusting an online source that doesn't appear to have that clout. I'd actually trust a review that went through an editor more than I'd trust the more personal blog reviews that I write. (My School Library Journal reviews, for example, are more concise, professional, and targeted than what I write here--which is far more based on my own opinion rather than taking a particular audience into account.)

But is there any reason why a book review source online couldn't follow that model? Maybe some of them already do. More food for thought.
alanajoli: (Johnny TwoStep)
I will be the first to admit that I am not a print newspaper reader. I actually detest the format. The pages are unmanageable and unweildy. The print makes your fingers black just from touching it. They even smell bad. So when the announcement comes in from both Publishers Weekly in this week's talk-back section on PW.com and the NYTBR (which I read online) that the Atlanta Journal-Constitution is dropping their book review section, it matters very little to me. I get my book reviews, as a reader, from industry magazines (which I read online), the NYTBR (which I read online), industry news sites, and blogs. I get monthly e-mails from the publishers that offer such things that tell me about their new books. I check amazon and BN.com for pub dates. (Okay, so sometimes I actually call my local bricks and mortar B&N. I'm not so online-exclusive that I won't use the phone.)

But I realize that just because I'm completely unaffected by the increasing trend over shorter review sections (or no reviews at all) in print newspapers, that doesn't mean it's a non-issue. So I highly recommend reading this week's NYTBR (which also features a delightful article on why bad books are valuable and a review of a book putting forth the remarkable idea that communication, perhaps even language, stemmed from alcohol), and perhaps popping over to PW's Talk-back before they change the topic.

I'd also love to hear what the writerly and editorly type folk who occasionally comment here think about a) newpaper reviews, b) online reviews, and c) reviews in general. We've been told for ages that they're a useful marketing tool, but all of us who have watched Spidey 3 know that a bad review can just about end a career as well. What is a review's value in an electronic age, and how do you gage the value of one type vs. another's?
alanajoli: (Default)
I missed noticing a new review of Into the Reach posted on Amazon in mid-March, but there it is! Departure is, as yet, unreviewed (anywhere). If you're a reviewer or blogger and would like to review Departure, and are willing to post a short review on amazon as well, I do have some (limited) press copies available. Let me know if you're interested!

There's also a copy of Into the Reach available on amazon for only six dollars--quite a steal. Departure is still nominally available at amazon with the "one copy left" tag line. I actually suspect they put that tag up when they have more than one left, but who knows?

In other news, while driving home from the Berkshires of Massachusetts last night, I passed by Hobbomock, the Sleeping Giant. I have a feeling I'll be getting very familiar with that route over the next few months.
alanajoli: (Default)
Having just caught up on various live journals, I paused to pay attention to Neil Gaiman's recent mention of Library Thing's UnSuggester. The idea is that they'll run some mathematical scan to see what books owned by Library Thing members are *unlikely* to be owned by Library Thing members who own other books. Hopefully that makes more sense when you read it than when I just typed it.

Here's an example, which I did as a test in response to Neil Gaiman's comment that people who own his books are unlikely to own books about Christianity. I plugged in Dark Night of the Soul, by St. John of the Cross, and got the following result. Of the 71 titles listed, I have either read or own 41 one of them. (Granted, some of what I've read I do not own, which is not the statistic they're measuring, and some of them I own I have not read, but that is a statistic they're measuring, so I believe it evens out.)

I think Library Thing is a great idea, but don't have time nor patience that would be required to log all my books, so it seems my status as a statistical anomaly will go unchanged.

--

I wish I had news on Departure for all of you, as it was supposed to be released this weekend, but alas, I don't. Or that I could tell you that both Amazon and Barnes and Noble were carrying Into the Reach before the holidays, but it looks like mid-January is the best we'll be able to do.

I did find a fun review online the other day though. Hurrah for google!

Here's a look at Steampunk Musha from The RPG Site.
Matt from Flames Rising was kind enough to post his review of Into the Reach in the comments of a recent entry here, but I forgot to actually post it on my page. Here it is.

There are also some comments about Into the Reach in forums, but those aren't full reviews, so I won't post them here. They're largely nice, though, which is a good feeling.

No word on whether Jewel Staite read the novel yet, but maybe someday we'll hear...

--

Edit: Oh! I almost forgot. After the review from the good folks over at RPG Blog, I checked out a novel by David Gemmel, Legend, due to the favorable comparison. I finally finished it last week (after it spent some time in my library pile) and I have to say it blew me away. I'm truly honored that his name came up in a review of my novel. We just bought another of his books, so I'll be reading that soon, as well. If you haven't read David Gemmell, do yourself a favor and put him on your reading list.

Profile

alanajoli: (Default)
Alana Joli Abbott

November 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213141516 1718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 28th, 2025 02:06 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios