alanajoli: (verity)
For today's guest blog, we're doing something a little different. Rob Schmidt is a journalist who produces Newspaper Rock: Where Native America Meets Pop Culture whom I met through a review of Cowboys and Aliens. What I didn't know at the time was that Rob is also the writer of Peace Party, a comic dedicated to promoting fair and accurate images of Native America while, of course, telling a good story. A couple of months ago, Rob gave me permission to excerpt some of his essay, "Why Write about Super Heroes?" for the blog. The full essay gets into the idea of the hero (from Cambpell through cowboys), compares gunslingers to Greek gods, and generally links the desire to perpetuate hero stories that has shown up in written culture time after time. The full essay is here, and it's well worth the read, but for now, just a quick excerpt from Rob's conclusion. Thanks, Rob, for letting me "reprint" an excerpt!

--

Who we write about is far from arbitrary. Rather, it reflects the deepest, most significant trends of history. Our choice of hero literally tells us where we've been and where we're going.

Let's grossly oversimplify world history and look at who our heroes have been. Note the following reflects the dominant Western/European/American view of history, not the reality:


  • The creation of civilization. The law-givers and philosopher kings. Moses, David, Jesus; Plato, Socrates, Aristotle.

  • The spread of civilization throughout the "known world." The warrior kings. Alexander the Great. Julius Caesar and the Roman legions. Charlemagne and the knights in shining armor.

  • The spread of civilization across the Atlantic. Explorers such as Leif Ericsson, Columbus, and Magellan. Pioneers such as the Spaniards (in New Spain), the Pilgrims, and the Colonials. Civilizers such as Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, and Teddy Roosevelt.

  • The spread of civilization around the globe. America as the world's source material (Walt Disney, John Wayne, Michael Jordan). America as the world's shining beacon (American GIs, JFK and Camelot, the astronauts). America as the world's superpower (Reagan, Bush, Powell).


The line that began with Moses and the first gathering of the "chosen people" has ended with America atop the world's heap. Our righteous country stands for truth, justice, and the American way and so does our righteous superhero. An archetypal character like Superman is the embodiment and culmination of human history.

Attentive readers will note that this conclusion neglects the 85% of the world that isn't Euro-American. Precisely. Though some people would wish otherwise, history has yet to end. The next challenge in our historical development will be perhaps the trickiest.

Unless large-scale space travel becomes a reality, we have nowhere left to spread. The dissemination phase of civilization is over. The next challenge is integration: meshing the dominant Euro-American culture with the non-dominant but much larger and older non-Euro-American cultures.

We can keep going in a straight line: "taming" and developing and building the world until it's one paved-over shopping mall and parking lot. As the last fish is caught, the last tree is cut, the last well runs dry, we can watch the great American civilization collapse into rubble. As Ozymandias put it, "Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!"

Or we can turn in a new direction: blending America's can-do drive and technology with the rest of the world's cultural norms. Living within our means. Valuing community over competition. Thinking seven generations ahead.

The choice is between seeing the present world go up in smoke or evolve into a kinder, gentler place. If we want the latter, we need a new kind of leader and icon. We need a new heroic paradigm.

Superman's brawny, know-it-all attitude won't cut it here. Brute force was fine for beating the Indians and digging the Panama Canal, but now we're dealing with bioengineering and nanotechnology. We need the subtlety and cleverness of a Trickster to merge the old and the new.
alanajoli: (Default)
This may sound idealistic, but I often don't notice gender or racial interplay in characters from novels because I read them first as characters. I was taught at a pretty early age that people are pretty much the same deep down, even if they're influenced by gender, race, religion, and culture. This isn't to say that I ignore those parts of people's personalities (or that I'm entirely blind to stereotypes or my own faults in making assumptions about other people's backgrounds based on surface level observations). I'm not perfect, and I don't always live up to my own ideal. (Heck, I probably don't live up to it very often. But I do try.) But I think that being taught that all of those bits that affect who we are are ingredients in the mix rather than defining factors has made me a little dumb about noticing stereotypes in fiction.

For example, in urban fantasy there's apparently this whole "Men with Boobs" movement that happens in the female characters. The idea is that the characters are actually exhibiting entirely male characteristics, but are depicted as female--possibly inaccurately. Maybe I've just missed these books and really would have noticed, but I sort of doubt it. There can be female characters who are very masculine, and that doesn't bother me--any more than a particularly effeminate male character would throw me off. Because I don't think of characteristics as belonging particularly to one gender or another: males can be nurturing (the nurturer role in my novels is fulfilled by a male), and females can be take-charge-and-head-into-danger.

Recently, though, Rob Schmidt of Newspaper Rock and Blue Corn Comics has gotten me thinking more and more about racial stereotyping in fiction. He deals predominantly with Native American stereotypes in pop culture, and he does a great job of pointing out why some things are bad. For example, a character who is Native American who is spiritual is not bad. But if all of the Native Americans are portrayed as spiritual, then that's buying into the New Age idea of the noble environmentalist--denying the characters the right to be people outside of their surface-level definition.

The reason I've been thinking about this in particular Read more... )

I had a bunch of other topics I wanted to blog about this week, but I'm still trying to bang out the work that I wanted to be done before I left home to celebrate Christmas with my family. I'll get back to blogging more regularly in the new year.

Profile

alanajoli: (Default)
Alana Joli Abbott

November 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
1213141516 1718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 11:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios